XIVAPI vs PotterDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified; game content © Square EnixUnverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)
Free tierFree; optional free key raises limitsFree — no key
Rate limitRate-limited; higher limits with a free key (see docs)Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

XIVAPI vs PotterDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, XIVAPI or PotterDB?

On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — XIVAPI at —% versus PotterDB at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do XIVAPI and PotterDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — XIVAPI is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call XIVAPI and PotterDB from the browser?

Yes — both XIVAPI and PotterDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are XIVAPI and PotterDB free for commercial use?

XIVAPI has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.