shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Wynncraft vs PotterDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIWynncraftUNMONITORED—PotterDBNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Wynncraft vs PotterDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, Wynncraft or PotterDB?

Only PotterDB is on our probe schedule so far (—% uptime over 90 days). The other is catalogued but not yet live-checked, so we can't compare measured reliability head-to-head — check the uncovered API's own status page for now.

Do Wynncraft and PotterDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Wynncraft is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Wynncraft and PotterDB from the browser?

Only PotterDB is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Wynncraft needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Wynncraft and PotterDB free for commercial use?

Wynncraft has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.