WhiskyHunter vs Longevity World Cup

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API keyFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

WhiskyHunter vs Longevity World Cup: common questions

Which is more reliable, WhiskyHunter or Longevity World Cup?

On our scheduled checks, Longevity World Cup leads on measured uptime — WhiskyHunter at —% versus Longevity World Cup at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do WhiskyHunter and Longevity World Cup need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — WhiskyHunter is callable with no signup, and Longevity World Cup is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call WhiskyHunter and Longevity World Cup from the browser?

Only Longevity World Cup is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. WhiskyHunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are WhiskyHunter and Longevity World Cup free for commercial use?

WhiskyHunter has unclear commercial terms, and Longevity World Cup has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.