Warnely vs Wikidata

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d90.2%100%
Uptime · 30d83.3%100%
P50 · ms334585
P95 · ms13753283
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Warnely vs Wikidata: common questions

Which is more reliable, Warnely or Wikidata?

On our scheduled checks, Wikidata leads on measured uptime — Warnely at 90.2% versus Wikidata at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Warnely or Wikidata?

Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — Warnely responds in 334 ms versus Wikidata at 585 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Warnely and Wikidata need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Warnely is callable with no signup, and Wikidata is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Warnely and Wikidata from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Warnely and Wikidata from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Warnely and Wikidata free for commercial use?

Warnely has unclear commercial terms, and Wikidata has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.