shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Urantia Papers vs Wiktionary

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIUrantia PapersNEW—WiktionaryNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedContent under CC BY-SA 4.0 / GFDL
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — public MediaWiki action API
Rate limit200 req/window · 199 remaining · resets 1783508497No hard published cap; Wikimedia User-Agent policy and request-etiquette apply
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Urantia Papers vs Wiktionary: common questions

Which is more reliable, Urantia Papers or Wiktionary?

On our scheduled checks, Wiktionary leads on measured uptime — Urantia Papers at —% versus Wiktionary at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Urantia Papers and Wiktionary need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Urantia Papers is callable with no signup, and Wiktionary is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Urantia Papers and Wiktionary from the browser?

Only Urantia Papers is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Wiktionary needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Urantia Papers and Wiktionary free for commercial use?

Urantia Papers has unclear commercial terms, and Wiktionary allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.