Umeå Open Data vs Voidly

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d93.3%86.0%
Uptime · 30d98.3%81.0%
P50 · ms11511865
P95 · ms48634655
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseVaries by dataset (municipal open data; see portal)CC BY 4.0
Free tierFree — open data portal, no keyFree (keyless data endpoints; Hydra ML endpoints need a key)
Rate limit1000 req/window · 999 remaining · resets 2026-07-09 00:00:00+00:00Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Umeå Open Data vs Voidly: common questions

Which is more reliable, Umeå Open Data or Voidly?

On our scheduled checks, Umeå Open Data leads on measured uptime — Umeå Open Data at 93.3% versus Voidly at 86.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Umeå Open Data or Voidly?

Umeå Open Data has the lower median latency in our checks — Umeå Open Data responds in 1151 ms versus Voidly at 1865 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Umeå Open Data and Voidly need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Umeå Open Data is callable with no signup, and Voidly is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Umeå Open Data and Voidly from the browser?

Yes — both Umeå Open Data and Voidly send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Umeå Open Data and Voidly free for commercial use?

Umeå Open Data has unclear commercial terms, and Voidly allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.