shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Trading View vs VALR

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APITrading ViewHEALTHY93VALRHEALTHY89
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms511696
P95 · ms16483273
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Trading View vs VALR: common questions

Which is more reliable, Trading View or VALR?

Both are neck-and-neck — Trading View and VALR each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Trading View or VALR?

Trading View has the lower median latency in our checks — Trading View responds in 511 ms versus VALR at 696 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Trading View and VALR need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Trading View uses an API key and VALR uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Trading View and VALR from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Trading View and VALR from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Trading View and VALR free for commercial use?

Trading View has unclear commercial terms, and VALR has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.