shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

The Guardian vs WhoisXML API Email Verification API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIThe GuardianDEAD0WhoisXML API Email Verification APIDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d50.6%0.0%
Uptime · 30d0.0%0.0%
P50 · ms517—
P95 · ms2726—
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree developer key — registration requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limit5000 calls/day (developer tier)Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

The Guardian vs WhoisXML API Email Verification API: common questions

Which is more reliable, The Guardian or WhoisXML API Email Verification API?

On our scheduled checks, The Guardian leads on measured uptime — The Guardian at 50.6% versus WhoisXML API Email Verification API at 0.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do The Guardian and WhoisXML API Email Verification API need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — The Guardian uses an API key and WhoisXML API Email Verification API uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call The Guardian and WhoisXML API Email Verification API from the browser?

Only WhoisXML API Email Verification API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. The Guardian needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are The Guardian and WhoisXML API Email Verification API free for commercial use?

The Guardian has unclear commercial terms, and WhoisXML API Email Verification API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.