The Guardian vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.0%90.2%
Uptime · 30d98.3%83.3%
P50 · ms742334
P95 · ms27261375
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree developer key — registration requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limit5000 calls/day (developer tier)100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

The Guardian vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, The Guardian or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, The Guardian leads on measured uptime — The Guardian at 98.0% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, The Guardian or Warnely?

Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — The Guardian responds in 742 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do The Guardian and Warnely need an API key?

Warnely needs no key, while The Guardian requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Warnely first.

Can I call The Guardian and Warnely from the browser?

Only The Guardian is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Warnely needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are The Guardian and Warnely free for commercial use?

The Guardian has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.