The Guardian vs Umeå Open Data

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d50.6%93.3%
Uptime · 30d0.0%98.3%
P50 · ms5171151
P95 · ms27264863
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedVaries by dataset (municipal open data; see portal)
Free tierFree developer key — registration requiredFree — open data portal, no key
Rate limit5000 calls/day (developer tier)1000 req/window · 999 remaining · resets 2026-07-09 00:00:00+00:00
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

The Guardian vs Umeå Open Data: common questions

Which is more reliable, The Guardian or Umeå Open Data?

On our scheduled checks, Umeå Open Data leads on measured uptime — The Guardian at 50.6% versus Umeå Open Data at 93.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, The Guardian or Umeå Open Data?

The Guardian has the lower median latency in our checks — The Guardian responds in 517 ms versus Umeå Open Data at 1151 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do The Guardian and Umeå Open Data need an API key?

Umeå Open Data needs no key, while The Guardian requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Umeå Open Data first.

Can I call The Guardian and Umeå Open Data from the browser?

Only Umeå Open Data is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. The Guardian needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are The Guardian and Umeå Open Data free for commercial use?

The Guardian has unclear commercial terms, and Umeå Open Data has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.