Telegraph vs TimeZones iCal Library

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms444237
P95 · ms3497642
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Telegraph vs TimeZones iCal Library: common questions

Which is more reliable, Telegraph or TimeZones iCal Library?

Both are neck-and-neck — Telegraph and TimeZones iCal Library each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Telegraph or TimeZones iCal Library?

TimeZones iCal Library has the lower median latency in our checks — Telegraph responds in 444 ms versus TimeZones iCal Library at 237 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Telegraph and TimeZones iCal Library need an API key?

TimeZones iCal Library needs no key, while Telegraph requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for TimeZones iCal Library first.

Can I call Telegraph and TimeZones iCal Library from the browser?

Yes — both Telegraph and TimeZones iCal Library send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Telegraph and TimeZones iCal Library free for commercial use?

Telegraph has unclear commercial terms, and TimeZones iCal Library has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.