shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Stytch vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIStytchHEALTHY94WarnelyDYING73
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%62.8%
Uptime · 30d100%3.3%
P50 · ms414342
P95 · ms12751554
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Stytch vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, Stytch or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, Stytch leads on measured uptime — Stytch at 100% versus Warnely at 62.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Stytch or Warnely?

Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — Stytch responds in 414 ms versus Warnely at 342 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Stytch and Warnely need an API key?

Warnely needs no key, while Stytch requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Warnely first.

Can I call Stytch and Warnely from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Stytch and Warnely from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Stytch and Warnely free for commercial use?

Stytch has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.