Statistics of the World vs Warnely
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Statistics of the World vs Warnely: common questions
Which is more reliable, Statistics of the World or Warnely?
On our scheduled checks, Statistics of the World leads on measured uptime — Statistics of the World at 100% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Statistics of the World or Warnely?
Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — Statistics of the World responds in 743 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Statistics of the World and Warnely need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Statistics of the World is callable with no signup, and Warnely is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Statistics of the World and Warnely from the browser?
Only Statistics of the World is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Warnely needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Statistics of the World and Warnely free for commercial use?
Statistics of the World has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.