SportScore vs TourneyRadar

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d87.3%98.0%
Uptime · 30d86.7%96.7%
P50 · ms2882911
P95 · ms21124191
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no key (attribution tier)Free — no key required
Rate limitRetry-After: 5s100 req/window · 99 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

SportScore vs TourneyRadar: common questions

Which is more reliable, SportScore or TourneyRadar?

On our scheduled checks, TourneyRadar leads on measured uptime — SportScore at 87.3% versus TourneyRadar at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, SportScore or TourneyRadar?

SportScore has the lower median latency in our checks — SportScore responds in 288 ms versus TourneyRadar at 2911 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do SportScore and TourneyRadar need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — SportScore is callable with no signup, and TourneyRadar is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call SportScore and TourneyRadar from the browser?

Only TourneyRadar is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SportScore needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are SportScore and TourneyRadar free for commercial use?

SportScore has unclear commercial terms, and TourneyRadar has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.