SportScore vs TheCocktailDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d87.3%100%
Uptime · 30d86.7%100%
P50 · ms288300
P95 · ms2112562
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no key (attribution tier)Free — limits not published
Rate limitRetry-After: 5sUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

SportScore vs TheCocktailDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, SportScore or TheCocktailDB?

On our scheduled checks, TheCocktailDB leads on measured uptime — SportScore at 87.3% versus TheCocktailDB at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, SportScore or TheCocktailDB?

SportScore has the lower median latency in our checks — SportScore responds in 288 ms versus TheCocktailDB at 300 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do SportScore and TheCocktailDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — SportScore is callable with no signup, and TheCocktailDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call SportScore and TheCocktailDB from the browser?

Only TheCocktailDB is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SportScore needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are SportScore and TheCocktailDB free for commercial use?

SportScore has unclear commercial terms, and TheCocktailDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.