Sofiaplan vs Umeå Open Data

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%89.2%
Uptime · 30d100%81.7%
P50 · ms16661445
P95 · ms34754863
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedVaries by dataset (municipal open data; see portal)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — open data portal, no key
Rate limitUnpublished1000 req/window · 999 remaining · resets 2026-07-09 00:00:00+00:00
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Sofiaplan vs Umeå Open Data: common questions

Which is more reliable, Sofiaplan or Umeå Open Data?

On our scheduled checks, Sofiaplan leads on measured uptime — Sofiaplan at 100% versus Umeå Open Data at 89.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Sofiaplan or Umeå Open Data?

Umeå Open Data has the lower median latency in our checks — Sofiaplan responds in 1666 ms versus Umeå Open Data at 1445 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Sofiaplan and Umeå Open Data need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Sofiaplan is callable with no signup, and Umeå Open Data is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Sofiaplan and Umeå Open Data from the browser?

Only Umeå Open Data is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Sofiaplan needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Sofiaplan and Umeå Open Data free for commercial use?

Sofiaplan has unclear commercial terms, and Umeå Open Data has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.