shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Shotstack vs SiteIntel

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIShotstackNEW—SiteIntelNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Shotstack vs SiteIntel: common questions

Which is more reliable, Shotstack or SiteIntel?

On our scheduled checks, SiteIntel leads on measured uptime — Shotstack at —% versus SiteIntel at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Shotstack and SiteIntel need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Shotstack uses an API key and SiteIntel uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Shotstack and SiteIntel from the browser?

Only Shotstack is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SiteIntel needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Shotstack and SiteIntel free for commercial use?

Shotstack has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.