Shoof Aflam vs TMDb

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms539352
P95 · ms13121528
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearno
Data licenseUnverifiedTMDb terms — attribution required
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree personal API key
Rate limitUnpublished~50 req/sec documented ceiling
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Shoof Aflam vs TMDb: common questions

Which is more reliable, Shoof Aflam or TMDb?

On our scheduled checks, TMDb leads on measured uptime — Shoof Aflam at 99.02% versus TMDb at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Shoof Aflam or TMDb?

TMDb has the lower median latency in our checks — Shoof Aflam responds in 539 ms versus TMDb at 352 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Shoof Aflam and TMDb need an API key?

Shoof Aflam needs no key, while TMDb requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Shoof Aflam first.

Can I call Shoof Aflam and TMDb from the browser?

Only TMDb is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Shoof Aflam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Shoof Aflam and TMDb free for commercial use?

Shoof Aflam has unclear commercial terms, and TMDb is personal/non-commercial only. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.