SHARE vs TensorFeed
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
SHARE vs TensorFeed: common questions
Which is more reliable, SHARE or TensorFeed?
On our scheduled checks, TensorFeed leads on measured uptime — SHARE at 98.9% versus TensorFeed at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, SHARE or TensorFeed?
SHARE has the lower median latency in our checks — SHARE responds in 261 ms versus TensorFeed at 306 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do SHARE and TensorFeed need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — SHARE is callable with no signup, and TensorFeed is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call SHARE and TensorFeed from the browser?
Yes — both SHARE and TensorFeed send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are SHARE and TensorFeed free for commercial use?
SHARE has unclear commercial terms, and TensorFeed has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.