Scryfall vs Wynncraft

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d96.1%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms470778
P95 · ms27672871
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseCard data free to use; MTG content © Wizards of the Coast (see docs)Unverified
Free tierFree, no API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limit~10 requests/second; docs ask for 50-100 ms between requestsUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Scryfall vs Wynncraft: common questions

Which is more reliable, Scryfall or Wynncraft?

On our scheduled checks, Wynncraft leads on measured uptime — Scryfall at 96.1% versus Wynncraft at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Scryfall or Wynncraft?

Scryfall has the lower median latency in our checks — Scryfall responds in 470 ms versus Wynncraft at 778 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Scryfall and Wynncraft need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Scryfall is callable with no signup, and Wynncraft is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Scryfall and Wynncraft from the browser?

Only Scryfall is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Wynncraft needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Scryfall and Wynncraft free for commercial use?

Scryfall has unclear commercial terms, and Wynncraft has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.