Scrnify vs SiteIntel

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms9271005
P95 · ms17423849
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Scrnify vs SiteIntel: common questions

Which is more reliable, Scrnify or SiteIntel?

Both are neck-and-neck — Scrnify and SiteIntel each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Scrnify or SiteIntel?

Scrnify has the lower median latency in our checks — Scrnify responds in 927 ms versus SiteIntel at 1005 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Scrnify and SiteIntel need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Scrnify uses an API key and SiteIntel uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Scrnify and SiteIntel from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Scrnify and SiteIntel from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Scrnify and SiteIntel free for commercial use?

Scrnify has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.