Screenshotlayer vs Verome

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%38.2%
Uptime · 30d100%0.0%
P50 · ms458884
P95 · ms22284329
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Screenshotlayer vs Verome: common questions

Which is more reliable, Screenshotlayer or Verome?

On our scheduled checks, Screenshotlayer leads on measured uptime — Screenshotlayer at 100% versus Verome at 38.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Screenshotlayer or Verome?

Screenshotlayer has the lower median latency in our checks — Screenshotlayer responds in 458 ms versus Verome at 884 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Screenshotlayer and Verome need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Screenshotlayer is callable with no signup, and Verome is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Screenshotlayer and Verome from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Screenshotlayer and Verome from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Screenshotlayer and Verome free for commercial use?

Screenshotlayer has unclear commercial terms, and Verome has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.