Screenshotlayer vs ThronesApi

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%97.1%
Uptime · 30d100%95.0%
P50 · ms458890
P95 · ms22284593
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Screenshotlayer vs ThronesApi: common questions

Which is more reliable, Screenshotlayer or ThronesApi?

On our scheduled checks, Screenshotlayer leads on measured uptime — Screenshotlayer at 100% versus ThronesApi at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Screenshotlayer or ThronesApi?

Screenshotlayer has the lower median latency in our checks — Screenshotlayer responds in 458 ms versus ThronesApi at 890 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Screenshotlayer and ThronesApi need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Screenshotlayer is callable with no signup, and ThronesApi is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Screenshotlayer and ThronesApi from the browser?

Only ThronesApi is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Screenshotlayer needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Screenshotlayer and ThronesApi free for commercial use?

Screenshotlayer has unclear commercial terms, and ThronesApi has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.