Screenshotlayer vs SWAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms458541
P95 · ms2228974
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 1783512035
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Screenshotlayer vs SWAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Screenshotlayer or SWAPI?

Both are neck-and-neck — Screenshotlayer and SWAPI each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Screenshotlayer or SWAPI?

Screenshotlayer has the lower median latency in our checks — Screenshotlayer responds in 458 ms versus SWAPI at 541 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Screenshotlayer and SWAPI need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Screenshotlayer is callable with no signup, and SWAPI is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Screenshotlayer and SWAPI from the browser?

Only SWAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Screenshotlayer needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Screenshotlayer and SWAPI free for commercial use?

Screenshotlayer has unclear commercial terms, and SWAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.