ScrapingDog vs SiteIntel
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ScrapingDog vs SiteIntel: common questions
Which is more reliable, ScrapingDog or SiteIntel?
Both are neck-and-neck — ScrapingDog and SiteIntel each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, ScrapingDog or SiteIntel?
ScrapingDog has the lower median latency in our checks — ScrapingDog responds in 195 ms versus SiteIntel at 1005 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ScrapingDog and SiteIntel need an API key?
Both ask you to authenticate — ScrapingDog uses an API key and SiteIntel uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.
Can I call ScrapingDog and SiteIntel from the browser?
Only ScrapingDog is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SiteIntel needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are ScrapingDog and SiteIntel free for commercial use?
ScrapingDog has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.