ScrapingDog vs Serialif Color

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%35.3%
Uptime · 30d100%36.7%
P50 · ms1951680
P95 · ms6213886
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ScrapingDog vs Serialif Color: common questions

Which is more reliable, ScrapingDog or Serialif Color?

On our scheduled checks, ScrapingDog leads on measured uptime — ScrapingDog at 100% versus Serialif Color at 35.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ScrapingDog or Serialif Color?

ScrapingDog has the lower median latency in our checks — ScrapingDog responds in 195 ms versus Serialif Color at 1680 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ScrapingDog and Serialif Color need an API key?

Serialif Color needs no key, while ScrapingDog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Serialif Color first.

Can I call ScrapingDog and Serialif Color from the browser?

Only ScrapingDog is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Serialif Color needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ScrapingDog and Serialif Color free for commercial use?

ScrapingDog has unclear commercial terms, and Serialif Color has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.