shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

RuntimeBuzz Article API vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIRuntimeBuzz Article APINEW—WarnelyNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

RuntimeBuzz Article API vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, RuntimeBuzz Article API or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, Warnely leads on measured uptime — RuntimeBuzz Article API at —% versus Warnely at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do RuntimeBuzz Article API and Warnely need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — RuntimeBuzz Article API is callable with no signup, and Warnely is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call RuntimeBuzz Article API and Warnely from the browser?

Only Warnely is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RuntimeBuzz Article API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are RuntimeBuzz Article API and Warnely free for commercial use?

RuntimeBuzz Article API has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.