RuntimeBuzz Article API vs Sofiaplan

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms5391666
P95 · ms12223475
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

RuntimeBuzz Article API vs Sofiaplan: common questions

Which is more reliable, RuntimeBuzz Article API or Sofiaplan?

Both are neck-and-neck — RuntimeBuzz Article API and Sofiaplan each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, RuntimeBuzz Article API or Sofiaplan?

RuntimeBuzz Article API has the lower median latency in our checks — RuntimeBuzz Article API responds in 539 ms versus Sofiaplan at 1666 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do RuntimeBuzz Article API and Sofiaplan need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — RuntimeBuzz Article API is callable with no signup, and Sofiaplan is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call RuntimeBuzz Article API and Sofiaplan from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call RuntimeBuzz Article API and Sofiaplan from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are RuntimeBuzz Article API and Sofiaplan free for commercial use?

RuntimeBuzz Article API has unclear commercial terms, and Sofiaplan has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.