RuneScape vs Traveller Map

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms15251184
P95 · ms36664428
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (© Jagex)Unverified
Free tierFree, no API keyFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

RuneScape vs Traveller Map: common questions

Which is more reliable, RuneScape or Traveller Map?

On our scheduled checks, RuneScape leads on measured uptime — RuneScape at 100% versus Traveller Map at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, RuneScape or Traveller Map?

Traveller Map has the lower median latency in our checks — RuneScape responds in 1525 ms versus Traveller Map at 1184 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do RuneScape and Traveller Map need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — RuneScape is callable with no signup, and Traveller Map is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call RuneScape and Traveller Map from the browser?

Only Traveller Map is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RuneScape needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are RuneScape and Traveller Map free for commercial use?

RuneScape has unclear commercial terms, and Traveller Map has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.