shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

RSS2JSON vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIRSS2JSONHEALTHY96WarnelyDYING89
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d96.1%90.2%
Uptime · 30d96.7%83.3%
P50 · ms178334
P95 · ms18821375
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

RSS2JSON vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, RSS2JSON or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, RSS2JSON leads on measured uptime — RSS2JSON at 96.1% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, RSS2JSON or Warnely?

RSS2JSON has the lower median latency in our checks — RSS2JSON responds in 178 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do RSS2JSON and Warnely need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — RSS2JSON is callable with no signup, and Warnely is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call RSS2JSON and Warnely from the browser?

Only RSS2JSON is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Warnely needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are RSS2JSON and Warnely free for commercial use?

RSS2JSON has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.