RestoSignals vs RSS2JSON

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.3%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms748102
P95 · ms7483629
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-192026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

RestoSignals vs RSS2JSON: common questions

Which is more reliable, RestoSignals or RSS2JSON?

On our scheduled checks, RestoSignals leads on measured uptime — RestoSignals at 100% versus RSS2JSON at 98.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, RestoSignals or RSS2JSON?

RSS2JSON has the lower median latency in our checks — RestoSignals responds in 748 ms versus RSS2JSON at 102 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do RestoSignals and RSS2JSON need an API key?

RSS2JSON needs no key, while RestoSignals requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for RSS2JSON first.

Can I call RestoSignals and RSS2JSON from the browser?

Only RSS2JSON is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RestoSignals needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are RestoSignals and RSS2JSON free for commercial use?

RestoSignals has unclear commercial terms, and RSS2JSON has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.