REST Countries vs Wikipedia REST

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms32898
P95 · ms1189961
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useyesyes
Data licenseMPL-2.0CC BY-SA 4.0
Free tierUnlimitedUnlimited within etiquette
Rate limitNone published200/sec global courtesy cap
In directory since2026-05-022026-05-09
operationalpartialdownno data

REST Countries vs Wikipedia REST: common questions

Which is more reliable, REST Countries or Wikipedia REST?

Both are neck-and-neck — REST Countries and Wikipedia REST each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, REST Countries or Wikipedia REST?

Wikipedia REST has the lower median latency in our checks — REST Countries responds in 328 ms versus Wikipedia REST at 98 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do REST Countries and Wikipedia REST need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — REST Countries is callable with no signup, and Wikipedia REST is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call REST Countries and Wikipedia REST from the browser?

Only Wikipedia REST is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. REST Countries needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are REST Countries and Wikipedia REST free for commercial use?

REST Countries allows commercial use on its free tier, and Wikipedia REST allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.