REST Countries vs Shields

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms32830
P95 · ms1189925
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useyesunclear
Data licenseMPL-2.0Unverified
Free tierUnlimitedFree — limits not published
Rate limitNone publishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-05-022026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

REST Countries vs Shields: common questions

Which is more reliable, REST Countries or Shields?

Both are neck-and-neck — REST Countries and Shields each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, REST Countries or Shields?

Shields has the lower median latency in our checks — REST Countries responds in 328 ms versus Shields at 30 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do REST Countries and Shields need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — REST Countries is callable with no signup, and Shields is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call REST Countries and Shields from the browser?

Only Shields is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. REST Countries needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are REST Countries and Shields free for commercial use?

REST Countries allows commercial use on its free tier, and Shields has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.