shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Replicate vs SpeechText.AI API API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIReplicateNEW—SpeechText.AI API APIREACHABLE—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Replicate vs SpeechText.AI API API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Replicate or SpeechText.AI API API?

On our scheduled checks, SpeechText.AI API API leads on measured uptime — Replicate at —% versus SpeechText.AI API API at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Replicate and SpeechText.AI API API need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Replicate uses an API key and SpeechText.AI API API uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Replicate and SpeechText.AI API API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Replicate and SpeechText.AI API API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Replicate and SpeechText.AI API API free for commercial use?

Replicate has unclear commercial terms, and SpeechText.AI API API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.