Remotive vs TwitterApi.IO

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms612242
P95 · ms25722593
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Remotive vs TwitterApi.IO: common questions

Which is more reliable, Remotive or TwitterApi.IO?

On our scheduled checks, Remotive leads on measured uptime — Remotive at 100% versus TwitterApi.IO at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Remotive or TwitterApi.IO?

TwitterApi.IO has the lower median latency in our checks — Remotive responds in 612 ms versus TwitterApi.IO at 242 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Remotive and TwitterApi.IO need an API key?

Remotive needs no key, while TwitterApi.IO requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Remotive first.

Can I call Remotive and TwitterApi.IO from the browser?

Only Remotive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TwitterApi.IO needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Remotive and TwitterApi.IO free for commercial use?

Remotive has unclear commercial terms, and TwitterApi.IO has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.