Razorpay IFSC vs Sugra

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.0%98.0%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms519775
P95 · ms10862394
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API keyFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Razorpay IFSC vs Sugra: common questions

Which is more reliable, Razorpay IFSC or Sugra?

Both are neck-and-neck — Razorpay IFSC and Sugra each measure 98.0% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Razorpay IFSC or Sugra?

Razorpay IFSC has the lower median latency in our checks — Razorpay IFSC responds in 519 ms versus Sugra at 775 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Razorpay IFSC and Sugra need an API key?

Razorpay IFSC needs no key, while Sugra requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Razorpay IFSC first.

Can I call Razorpay IFSC and Sugra from the browser?

Only Razorpay IFSC is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Sugra needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Razorpay IFSC and Sugra free for commercial use?

Razorpay IFSC has unclear commercial terms, and Sugra has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.