Razorpay IFSC vs Sugra

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.9%97.8%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms495452
P95 · ms44354052
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API keyFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Razorpay IFSC vs Sugra: common questions

Which is more reliable, Razorpay IFSC or Sugra?

On our scheduled checks, Razorpay IFSC leads on measured uptime — Razorpay IFSC at 98.9% versus Sugra at 97.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Razorpay IFSC or Sugra?

Sugra has the lower median latency in our checks — Razorpay IFSC responds in 495 ms versus Sugra at 452 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Razorpay IFSC and Sugra need an API key?

Razorpay IFSC needs no key, while Sugra requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Razorpay IFSC first.

Can I call Razorpay IFSC and Sugra from the browser?

Only Razorpay IFSC is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Sugra needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Razorpay IFSC and Sugra free for commercial use?

Razorpay IFSC has unclear commercial terms, and Sugra has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.