shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

RandomUser vs Beeceptor

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIRandomUserNEW—BeeceptorNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (generated data; sample photos governed by UI Faces terms)Unverified
Free tierFree — no key or signupFree public echo host, no signup
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

RandomUser vs Beeceptor: common questions

Which is more reliable, RandomUser or Beeceptor?

On our scheduled checks, Beeceptor leads on measured uptime — RandomUser at —% versus Beeceptor at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do RandomUser and Beeceptor need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — RandomUser is callable with no signup, and Beeceptor is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call RandomUser and Beeceptor from the browser?

Yes — both RandomUser and Beeceptor send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are RandomUser and Beeceptor free for commercial use?

RandomUser has unclear commercial terms, and Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.