RandomDuck vs RandomFox
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
RandomDuck vs RandomFox: common questions
Which is more reliable, RandomDuck or RandomFox?
On our scheduled checks, RandomDuck leads on measured uptime — RandomDuck at 100% versus RandomFox at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, RandomDuck or RandomFox?
RandomDuck has the lower median latency in our checks — RandomDuck responds in 459 ms versus RandomFox at 672 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do RandomDuck and RandomFox need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — RandomDuck is callable with no signup, and RandomFox is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call RandomDuck and RandomFox from the browser?
Only RandomFox is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RandomDuck needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are RandomDuck and RandomFox free for commercial use?
RandomDuck has unclear commercial terms, and RandomFox has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.