Random Profiles vs Spoo.me

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms282362
P95 · ms25291478
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Random Profiles vs Spoo.me: common questions

Which is more reliable, Random Profiles or Spoo.me?

Both are neck-and-neck — Random Profiles and Spoo.me each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Random Profiles or Spoo.me?

Random Profiles has the lower median latency in our checks — Random Profiles responds in 282 ms versus Spoo.me at 362 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Random Profiles and Spoo.me need an API key?

Spoo.me needs no key, while Random Profiles requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Spoo.me first.

Can I call Random Profiles and Spoo.me from the browser?

Only Random Profiles is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Spoo.me needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Random Profiles and Spoo.me free for commercial use?

Random Profiles has unclear commercial terms, and Spoo.me has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.