shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Random Profiles vs Beeceptor

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIRandom ProfilesUNMONITORED—BeeceptorNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree public echo host, no signup
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Random Profiles vs Beeceptor: common questions

Which is more reliable, Random Profiles or Beeceptor?

Only Beeceptor is on our probe schedule so far (—% uptime over 90 days). The other is catalogued but not yet live-checked, so we can't compare measured reliability head-to-head — check the uncovered API's own status page for now.

Do Random Profiles and Beeceptor need an API key?

Beeceptor needs no key, while Random Profiles requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Beeceptor first.

Can I call Random Profiles and Beeceptor from the browser?

Yes — both Random Profiles and Beeceptor send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Random Profiles and Beeceptor free for commercial use?

Random Profiles has unclear commercial terms, and Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.