Raider vs Wynncraft

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.9%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms140608
P95 · ms41602505
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Blizzard game data)Unverified
Free tierFree, no API key for public dataFree — limits not published
Rate limit300 req/window · 0 remaining · resets 1787935537Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Raider vs Wynncraft: common questions

Which is more reliable, Raider or Wynncraft?

On our scheduled checks, Wynncraft leads on measured uptime — Raider at 98.9% versus Wynncraft at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Raider or Wynncraft?

Raider has the lower median latency in our checks — Raider responds in 140 ms versus Wynncraft at 608 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Raider and Wynncraft need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Raider is callable with no signup, and Wynncraft is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Raider and Wynncraft from the browser?

Yes — both Raider and Wynncraft send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Raider and Wynncraft free for commercial use?

Raider has unclear commercial terms, and Wynncraft has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.