Raider vs Traveller Map

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms2231184
P95 · ms12224428
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Blizzard game data)Unverified
Free tierFree, no API key for public dataFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Raider vs Traveller Map: common questions

Which is more reliable, Raider or Traveller Map?

On our scheduled checks, Raider leads on measured uptime — Raider at 100% versus Traveller Map at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Raider or Traveller Map?

Raider has the lower median latency in our checks — Raider responds in 223 ms versus Traveller Map at 1184 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Raider and Traveller Map need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Raider is callable with no signup, and Traveller Map is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Raider and Traveller Map from the browser?

Yes — both Raider and Traveller Map send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Raider and Traveller Map free for commercial use?

Raider has unclear commercial terms, and Traveller Map has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.