Raider vs RuneScape

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.9%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms140707
P95 · ms41603666
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Blizzard game data)Unverified (© Jagex)
Free tierFree, no API key for public dataFree, no API key
Rate limit300 req/window · 0 remaining · resets 1787935537Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Raider vs RuneScape: common questions

Which is more reliable, Raider or RuneScape?

On our scheduled checks, RuneScape leads on measured uptime — Raider at 98.9% versus RuneScape at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Raider or RuneScape?

Raider has the lower median latency in our checks — Raider responds in 140 ms versus RuneScape at 707 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Raider and RuneScape need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Raider is callable with no signup, and RuneScape is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Raider and RuneScape from the browser?

Only Raider is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RuneScape needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Raider and RuneScape free for commercial use?

Raider has unclear commercial terms, and RuneScape has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.