RacingHub vs TourneyRadar

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%98.0%
Uptime · 30d98.3%96.7%
P50 · ms4732911
P95 · ms35574191
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseCC BY 4.0 (source data from the F1DB project)Unverified
Free tierFree — no key requiredFree — no key required
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60100 req/window · 99 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

RacingHub vs TourneyRadar: common questions

Which is more reliable, RacingHub or TourneyRadar?

On our scheduled checks, RacingHub leads on measured uptime — RacingHub at 99.02% versus TourneyRadar at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, RacingHub or TourneyRadar?

RacingHub has the lower median latency in our checks — RacingHub responds in 473 ms versus TourneyRadar at 2911 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do RacingHub and TourneyRadar need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — RacingHub is callable with no signup, and TourneyRadar is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call RacingHub and TourneyRadar from the browser?

Yes — both RacingHub and TourneyRadar send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are RacingHub and TourneyRadar free for commercial use?

RacingHub has unclear commercial terms, and TourneyRadar has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.