shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Quran-api vs Wiktionary

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIQuran-apiNEW—WiktionaryNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedContent under CC BY-SA 4.0 / GFDL
Free tierFree, no key (static CDN JSON files)Free — public MediaWiki action API
Rate limitNone (served as static files from jsDelivr CDN)No hard published cap; Wikimedia User-Agent policy and request-etiquette apply
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Quran-api vs Wiktionary: common questions

Which is more reliable, Quran-api or Wiktionary?

On our scheduled checks, Wiktionary leads on measured uptime — Quran-api at —% versus Wiktionary at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Quran-api and Wiktionary need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Quran-api is callable with no signup, and Wiktionary is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Quran-api and Wiktionary from the browser?

Only Quran-api is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Wiktionary needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Quran-api and Wiktionary free for commercial use?

Quran-api has unclear commercial terms, and Wiktionary allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.