Quotes on Design vs TasteDive

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms354325
P95 · ms9752265
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Quotes on Design vs TasteDive: common questions

Which is more reliable, Quotes on Design or TasteDive?

Both are neck-and-neck — Quotes on Design and TasteDive each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Quotes on Design or TasteDive?

TasteDive has the lower median latency in our checks — Quotes on Design responds in 354 ms versus TasteDive at 325 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Quotes on Design and TasteDive need an API key?

Quotes on Design needs no key, while TasteDive requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Quotes on Design first.

Can I call Quotes on Design and TasteDive from the browser?

Only Quotes on Design is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TasteDive needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Quotes on Design and TasteDive free for commercial use?

Quotes on Design has unclear commercial terms, and TasteDive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.