Quandl vs Warnely
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Quandl vs Warnely: common questions
Which is more reliable, Quandl or Warnely?
On our scheduled checks, Quandl leads on measured uptime — Quandl at 100% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Quandl or Warnely?
Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — Quandl responds in 823 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Quandl and Warnely need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Quandl is callable with no signup, and Warnely is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Quandl and Warnely from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Quandl and Warnely from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are Quandl and Warnely free for commercial use?
Quandl has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.