Quandl vs RSS2JSON
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Quandl vs RSS2JSON: common questions
Which is more reliable, Quandl or RSS2JSON?
On our scheduled checks, Quandl leads on measured uptime — Quandl at 100% versus RSS2JSON at 96.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Quandl or RSS2JSON?
RSS2JSON has the lower median latency in our checks — Quandl responds in 823 ms versus RSS2JSON at 178 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Quandl and RSS2JSON need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Quandl is callable with no signup, and RSS2JSON is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Quandl and RSS2JSON from the browser?
Only RSS2JSON is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Quandl needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Quandl and RSS2JSON free for commercial use?
Quandl has unclear commercial terms, and RSS2JSON has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.