PurgoMalum vs WebScraping.AI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d86.3%100%
Uptime · 30d85.0%100%
P50 · ms423460
P95 · ms48331109
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

PurgoMalum vs WebScraping.AI: common questions

Which is more reliable, PurgoMalum or WebScraping.AI?

On our scheduled checks, WebScraping.AI leads on measured uptime — PurgoMalum at 86.3% versus WebScraping.AI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, PurgoMalum or WebScraping.AI?

PurgoMalum has the lower median latency in our checks — PurgoMalum responds in 423 ms versus WebScraping.AI at 460 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do PurgoMalum and WebScraping.AI need an API key?

PurgoMalum needs no key, while WebScraping.AI requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for PurgoMalum first.

Can I call PurgoMalum and WebScraping.AI from the browser?

Only PurgoMalum is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. WebScraping.AI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are PurgoMalum and WebScraping.AI free for commercial use?

PurgoMalum has unclear commercial terms, and WebScraping.AI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.