Psychonauts API vs xkcd
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Psychonauts API vs xkcd: common questions
Which is more reliable, Psychonauts API or xkcd?
On our scheduled checks, xkcd leads on measured uptime — Psychonauts API at 99.02% versus xkcd at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Psychonauts API or xkcd?
xkcd has the lower median latency in our checks — Psychonauts API responds in 2979 ms versus xkcd at 164 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Psychonauts API and xkcd need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Psychonauts API is callable with no signup, and xkcd is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Psychonauts API and xkcd from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Psychonauts API and xkcd from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are Psychonauts API and xkcd free for commercial use?
Psychonauts API has unclear commercial terms, and xkcd is personal/non-commercial only. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.